This Page

has been moved to new address

Epwin Group And Latium Merge With Immediate Effect

Sorry for inconvenience...

Redirection provided by Blogger to WordPress Migration Service
Double Glazing Blogger: Epwin Group And Latium Merge With Immediate Effect

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Epwin Group And Latium Merge With Immediate Effect

 A tweet from the @glasstimes Twitter account reads as follows: 

"The Epwin Group and Latium have merged with immediate effect to create Epwin Holdings, a 275million turnover building products group."

To be honest, I'm a little bit gutted I didn't know anything about this! But I'll get over it!

My immediate reaction was one of surprise. But then again, we all expected further consolidation of the double glazing market, and this announcement goes to prove what many people were thinking. 


The name 'Epwin Holdings' interests me. In the tweet it says there was a merger, but the retention of the Epwin name makes me wonder if Epwin Group actually bought out Latium. And if there was a buy-out, my next question would be about potential job losses. Will there be any? If so, how many? When would the axe fall?

How much of Latium is likely to be retained? Would Latium be swallowed up by Epwin? Will their products disappear over time? Will Epwin take on some of Latiums best products and improve and focus on them?

These are just my initial thoughts and questions on the matter. Once more details are flooded into Twitter and the online magazines, I'll be able to make a better judgement on this announcement.

UPDATE: here is the press release from the Ewpin Group:


The Epwin Group and Latium have merged with immediate effect [17/1/12] to create a significant and diverse new UK building products group.


Including established Epwin brands, Profile 22, Swish Window and Door Systems, Swish Building Products and Sierra amongst others, alongside Latium companies Spectus, Kestrel-BCE and glass processing business CET - the agreement creates a new group with a combined turnover in excess of £275m.


With more than 2,500 employees, the company, Epwin Holdings, will be led by a new senior board chaired by Epwin Group founder Jim Rawson and including Latium owner, Brain Kennedy, the existing shareholders.


Jim Rawson, chairman, Epwin Holdings, said: "This is a major opportunity for the UK building products industry. In bringing together many of it's leading businesses, in a British run, British owned group, we have the resource to invest in individual brands, product innovation and service, grow our business and most importantly, support our customers across sectors in doing the same."


He added: "We don't expect any significant changes to the operational structure of Group businesses in the medium term - this is very much business as usual for customers, employees and suppliers."


The Epwin Group was founded by Rawson in 1976. Floated on the Stock Exchange in 1987, it was brought back into private ownership in 2000. More than a decade on, it continues to deliver a lead in technology and sustainable innovation to the UK building product industry.


Latium companies, owned by entrepreneur and investor Brian Kennedy were acquired, in part, from Heywood Williams in 2005.

Funding for the merged group has been provided exclusively by Barclays Corporate, Bristol.


Brian Kennedy said: "There is a very strong commercial fit between Latium and Epwin businesses and the merger creates tremendous new opportunities for both employees, customers and suppliers."


"It has both the stability and financial resource to see out challenges and to secure new opportunities, something which we are confident will deliver advantages for not just it's member businesses but customers and the building products industry more broadly."


For further information visit www.epwin.co.uk


I hope that all the mentions of new opportunities and chances for growth and prosperity come to fruition. There have been too many company take overs, not just in the window industry but all others, where job losses has been the immediate focus. It says in the statement that in the medium-term, there will be no changes in regards to employees. But it does leave the door open a little bit in terms of long-term restructuring. But all in all, a very positive statement. I wish all companies involved the best of luck!

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

8 Comments:

Anonymous Nige said...

3 or 4 profile systems companpies under one roof. Surely they`ll not keep them all going! Selling Zoom conservatory probably had something to do with the merger,Can,t have Ultraframe, wendland and zoom all fighting for the same customers...

January 17, 2012 at 10:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is business as usual at Ultraframe and for its customers. We are not part of the Latium/Epwin merger, and will continue as an independent and seperate company. It is a strong brand and will continue to service our loyal customers, and we are looking forward to developing the the light and space market.

January 17, 2012 at 12:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It makes me laugh that you're annoyed that you didn't hear this news early.

You are suffering from the delusion that you somehow have your finger on the pulse of our industry. Nothing could be further from the truth; it's clear from your blog that, most of the time, you're blissfully unaware of what's going on out there. Granted, you occasionally get wind of a rumour that turns out to be true and which - because you're desperate to be seen as a credible commentator - you publish early. Even then you invariably cock it up, publishing falsehoods that you have to hastily retract.

You're far too eager to publish something big - solely so that you get bragging rights - without researching or understanding what you're talking about. That desperation makes you gullible and naïve, with the result that - on at least one occasion that I know of - you've been deliberately fed a false story about a competitor which you've gone on to publish (and subsequently had to remove after the threat of legal action - I'll let you work out which of your posts I'm referring to).

However, much worse than all this is the fact that while you're blundering around in the dark publishing any old nonsense, you forget that the companies you're commenting on have real people working for them, with real families who rely on them. In your rush to publish the latest false gossip about Company X, you forget that Company X's staff may well be reading your posts, wondering what on earth is going on and whether they'll have their job in the morning. And all so you can feed your delusion of grandeur.

You have managed to get yourself a bit of a reputation within certain sectors of our industry, but not - I fear - the sort of reputation you'd like. "Mouthy kid who doesn't know what he's talking about" sums it up. It seems, in the view many, your ego far outstrips your talent when it comes to industry journalism.

January 17, 2012 at 7:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon (no. 2) - Is this what you would say to a major news company that broadcast rumours and confirmations about major companies going into administration?

If rumours are out there, then one way or another employees are going to hear about them. And in this day and age, no matter how much research you do into a rumour, nine times out of ten companies are not going to comment on these rumours, thus, journalists predict that they are in fact true.

Rumours are the start of a news story. If you hear a rumour, you do research, which is what DGB does every time he hears one. But when the facts are there, what else can one say? If there is a story there, why not talk about it?

Fact is that nowadays, companies don't have much intelligence in how the internet works. People find out things in all sorts of ways and most often than not, businesses find themselves being talked about on a blog and these companies don't know how to handle them. Rumours are rumours. Until they are confirmed they will stay that way. And rumours ALWAYS get posted in one way or another.

Companies need to learn how to deal with these. DGB is doing an excellent job in informing everyone about possible future changes and preparing people for the worst. Major news companies give news like this every day, what's the difference here?

Having a personal dig at DGB isn't going to solve anything. If he goes, another will just take his place. You will always have to deal with the "mouthy kid". But gullible and naive? I think not. This is the effort of a person who is informing us of the possible changes of this industry, just like those of other journalists.

January 17, 2012 at 9:55 PM  
Anonymous Peter Webb said...

Dear Anonymous

Let me respond independently and with no connection to this blog or the blogger, however your response had ME laughing...

First and foremost, if you're going to comment in this way, why not have the balls to reveal yourself? Your reply attempts to give the impression you are in the same business (lets hope for the sake of your customers, you're not if this is how you react to something you don't agree with).

Quote: "To be honest, I'm a little bit gutted I didn't know anything about this! But I'll get over it!"

You didn't suppose there was sarcasm in that comment and DGB was merely being ironic? The exclamation mark was a bit of a giveway I feel.

Get real please? Nobody in this industry is THAT connected, apart from the much mocked industry clique or "groupies" who routinely fawn and dote over each other.

I have followed this blog for a couple of years now and whilst I will be the first to admit that this is a young guy who has got it wrong from time to time (we all learn from experience) rather than launch into a personal attack why not do what the more professional and polite people than you have done on this blog when they have disagreed with something - factually and respectfully point out where he has gone wrong?

There are plenty of blogs on here where DBG has said something incorrect or simply not researched a topic and has very quickly been corrected. That is the point of the comment box! If you're going to comment, show some bloody manners!

There are few young people willing to enter this business or people of any age for that matter willing to commit time to and discuss the industry, whether you agree with the way DGB does it or not. Yes he might get it wrong but if you run a site or write a blog you'll understand the committment and time that goes to it. Again, some respect please?

With regard to the blog that had to be removed for "threat of legal action" Please may I suggest you do further research? I can, with knowledge, experience and confidence tell you, there would have been no chance of any legal action suceeeding and if you delve a little deeper someone of your intelligence will very quickly realise why! (this assuming we are referring to the same blog).

Finally and most importantly, this is a blog! A blog is a place for people to air their opinions whether they be right or wrong ones.

Finally, may I suggest you return to the hompage of this blog - top left the statement:

I'll speak my mind!

ps And I don't recall the guy ever saying he WAS a journalist?

January 17, 2012 at 10:10 PM  
Anonymous Sylvie said...

Anon. (no. 3) I agree with you. Anon (no.2) if you do not like it then do not read it. the blog is an optional site to read and purely his opinion, sometimes you agree and sometimes you don't.

January 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mmm nice corporate statement from no.2 , but Utraframe are owned by Latium and by default are part of the merger. This isn't a bad thing of course as it will have better scope to tap into the fabricators that Epwin have,but it's no surprise to see them try and desperately fend this news off with some smoke and mirrors!

January 18, 2012 at 7:40 AM  
Anonymous Nick said...

my two penneth!

blog/blôg/
Noun:
A Web site on which an individual or group of users record opinions, information, etc. on a regular basis.

I think that kills Anon2 rather "emotional" response out of the water somewhat

January 18, 2012 at 9:35 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home